Kyle Seyler
January 23, 2026

TL;DR: Alert fatigue is when users stop responding to notifications because there are too many. The term comes from healthcare, where alarm systems in hospitals became so noisy that staff started ignoring them, sometimes missing critical patient alerts.
The same pattern happens in product notifications: send too many, and users tune them out entirely.
Alert fatigue is a form of habituation, a psychological process where repeated exposure to a stimulus reduces your response to it. The first time your phone buzzes, you check it. By the hundredth buzz of the day, you ignore it.
There's also a "cry wolf" effect. If most notifications are low-value (promotional emails, social media likes, routine updates), users learn that notifications aren't worth their attention. When a genuinely important notification arrives, it gets the same dismissive treatment.
This creates a destructive cycle:
Breaking this cycle requires sending fewer, better notifications.
The term originated in healthcare, but the problem exists everywhere:
| Industry | Alert fatigue example |
|---|---|
| Healthcare | ICU monitors generate 150-400 alarms per patient per day. Studies show 72-99% are false alarms. Staff become desensitized. |
| DevOps/SRE | On-call engineers receive hundreds of alerts per shift. Critical incidents get lost in the noise of flapping services and low-priority warnings. |
| Security (SOC) | Security analysts face thousands of alerts daily. The average SOC investigates only 56% of alerts received. |
| Product/Consumer | Users receive 46 push notifications per day on average. 60% of users disable push notifications within a week of installation. |
The pattern is consistent: high volume leads to low response rates, which leads to missed critical events.
You can't fix what you don't measure. These metrics indicate alert fatigue in your notification system:
Open rate decline over time Track notification open rates week-over-week for the same notification types. A steady decline suggests fatigue.
Dismiss rate / swipe-away rate High dismiss rates (notifications swiped away without opening) indicate low-value notifications.
Time-to-action How long between notification delivery and user action? Increasing delays suggest users are batching their notification reviews instead of responding immediately.
Notification opt-out rate Track how many users disable specific notification categories or all notifications. High opt-out rates are the clearest signal of fatigue.
Critical alert response time For systems with tiered priority, measure response time specifically for high-priority alerts. If critical alerts get slow responses, fatigue has reached dangerous levels.
Benchmark these metrics before making changes, then track improvement as you implement fixes.
Instead of sending five separate notifications for five new comments, send one notification summarizing all five.
Batching reduces volume without reducing information. Users get the same content in fewer interruptions.
Effective batching requires:
Courier's workflow automation includes batching nodes that group notifications by time window or event count.
Not all notifications deserve equal treatment. Categorize your notifications by actual importance:
| Priority | Example | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Security alerts, payment failures, system outages | Immediate, multi-channel |
| High | Direct messages, mentions, assignment changes | Immediate, primary channel |
| Medium | Comments, likes, activity updates | Batched or delayed |
| Low | Marketing, suggestions, "you might like" | Digest only, or don't send |
Many products treat everything as high priority. That's the same as treating nothing as high priority.

Users know better than you which notifications they want. Give them control:
A hosted preference center reduces the chance users will disable notifications entirely. If they can turn off marketing notifications while keeping critical alerts, they're less likely to uninstall or revoke permissions.
Different notifications belong on different channels:
| Notification type | Best channel | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Security alert | Push + Email + SMS | Redundancy for critical information |
| Direct message | Push or In-app | Real-time, conversational |
| Weekly digest | Long-form, can be read later | |
| Transactional confirmation | Reference document | |
| Live event update | Push | Time-sensitive |
Sending everything through push maximizes fatigue. Routing low-priority content to email or in-app feeds keeps your push channel valuable.
Multi-channel routing also enables smart escalation: start with in-app, escalate to push if not seen, escalate to email if still not seen.

When you send matters as much as what you send.
Avoid notification storms: If your system generates many events at once (batch job completion, bulk import), spread notifications over time instead of sending all at once.
Respect time zones: A notification at 3am is almost certainly going to be dismissed without reading.
Learn from user behavior: If a user consistently opens notifications at 9am and 6pm, those are good times to send. Notifications at other times compete with their focus time.
Courier's delay and delivery window features let you schedule notifications for optimal times without building this logic yourself.
Alert fatigue isn't just an annoyance. It has measurable business impact:
Missed critical information: When users ignore notifications, they miss things that matter. This could mean missed security alerts, failed payments they don't notice, or messages from customers they don't respond to.
Reduced engagement: Users who've tuned out notifications are less engaged overall. They visit your product less frequently and are more likely to churn.
Permission revocation: On mobile, push notification permission is precious. Once a user revokes it, you've lost a direct communication channel. Getting permission back is extremely difficult.
Brand perception: Apps that spam notifications get a reputation for it. Users warn others away.

Building anti-fatigue features in-house requires significant investment:
Notification infrastructure platforms provide these features out of the box.
Courier includes:
These features work together. You can build a workflow that batches low-priority notifications, respects user channel preferences, and only sends during preferred hours, without writing custom code.
Alert fatigue is a real problem with measurable consequences. Users who receive too many notifications stop responding to any of them, including the ones that matter.
The solution isn't to stop sending notifications. It's to send fewer, better notifications through the right channels at the right times, while giving users control over their preferences.
| Strategy | Impact |
|---|---|
| Batching | Reduces volume without losing information |
| Prioritization | Ensures critical alerts stand out |
| User preferences | Prevents all-or-nothing opt-out |
| Channel routing | Keeps high-value channels valuable |
| Timing optimization | Respects user attention and context |
For more on reducing notification fatigue:
Dealing with notification fatigue in your product? Request a demo to see how Courier's batching, throttling, and preference management can help.

Build Multi-tenant Customer Messaging the Right Way | Branding, User Preferences, Routing
Most teams don’t plan multi-tenant messaging... they back into it when customers want their branding, routing, Slack workspace, and default preferences. This guide shows how to model tenant context so every message uses the right customer defaults without per-customer logic in your codebase.
By Thomas Schiavone
January 22, 2026

Notification Observability: How to Monitor Delivery, Engagement, and Provider Health
Notification observability is the practice of monitoring notification delivery, engagement, and provider health using the same tools and discipline you apply to the rest of your application infrastructure. It means tracking whether messages are delivered, opened, and acted on across email, SMS, push, and in-app channels, then surfacing that data in dashboards alongside your other application metrics. Key metrics include delivery rate by channel, bounce and failure rates, provider latency, open rate trends, and click-through rates by template. Teams can build notification observability through DIY webhook handlers that pipe provider events to Datadog or Prometheus, log aggregation from application send logs, or notification platforms with built-in observability integrations. This matters most for multi-channel systems, business-critical notifications like password resets and payment confirmations, and teams using multiple providers with fallback routing.
By Kyle Seyler
January 15, 2026

Multichannel Notification Template Management: Version Control, Migration, and Cross-Channel Previews
AI agents are reshaping how products communicate with users. By 2026, 40% of enterprise applications will embed agents that need to send notifications across email, SMS, push, Slack, Teams, and in-app channels autonomously. Managing templates across all these channels with Git-based workflows doesn't scale. This guide covers how teams handle version control and rollback for multichannel templates, which platforms enable designer collaboration without deploys, whether Figma design systems can connect to notification builders, how to migrate templates using APIs and MCP-assisted workflows, how to preview messages across channels side-by-side, open-source options that integrate with SendGrid, Twilio, Firebase, and Slack, and how to localize content from one dashboard. Platforms covered include Courier, Novu, Knock, SuprSend, Dyspatch, Email Love, and React Email, with honest assessments of limitations for each.
By Kyle Seyler
January 14, 2026
© 2026 Courier. All rights reserved.