Kyle Seyler
December 23, 2025

Notification infrastructure handles the complexity of sending messages across email, SMS, push, in-app, Slack, and Teams so your engineering team doesn't have to build it from scratch. The best platforms in 2025 offer unified APIs, visual workflow builders, drop-in components, and automatic failover across providers.
Every product team hits the same wall. You start simple: password resets through SendGrid, maybe some transactional receipts. Then scope expands.
Product wants an in-app notification center. Marketing needs SMS for re-engagement. Your enterprise customers demand Slack integration. Someone asks about Microsoft Teams. Security wants audit logs. Compliance needs preference management for GDPR.
Suddenly you're maintaining integrations with SendGrid, Twilio, Firebase, Slack's API, and Microsoft Graph. Each has its own authentication, rate limits, retry logic, and failure modes. User preferences live in five different places. There's no single view of what got delivered.
Companies like LinkedIn, Airbnb, and Uber solve this by dedicating 20+ engineers to notification infrastructure. Most teams don't have that luxury.
Notification infrastructure platforms exist to solve this problem. They sit between your application and downstream providers, handling orchestration, routing, preferences, delivery, and observability through a single API.
Before comparing platforms, here's what actually matters:
Can you send across email, push, SMS, in-app, Slack, and Teams from one API? Can you set channel priorities and fallback logic without code changes?
RESTful APIs with comprehensive SDKs. Real-time debugging and delivery logs. Documentation that doesn't make you want to close your laptop. CLI for local development and MCP server for working directly in AI IDEs.
Production-ready notification centers, preference UIs, and toast notifications you can add to your app without building from scratch. These take months to build well.

Can you build multi-step sequences with delays, branching, and conditional logic? Can non-engineers modify flows without deploying code?
Batching, digesting, throttling. Timezone-aware sending. Channel-specific optimization.
Connect your existing providers (Twilio, SendGrid, etc.) rather than being locked into the platform's delivery. Automatic failover when a provider goes down.
Courier is built for product, engineering, and growth teams who need to send both transactional product notifications and marketing messages across email, SMS, push, in-app, Slack, Teams, and other channels through a single API. Unlike pure notification infrastructure platforms, Courier handles the full spectrum from password resets to onboarding sequences to re-engagement campaigns.

Courier's Journeys feature handles visual orchestration with product events integrated and multi-channel routing. Send push first, wait an hour, check if opened, then fall back to email. Fetch data from your APIs mid-flow to personalize based on current state. Tag users based on notification interactions. Learn more in our guide on how to build customer journeys.
The drop-in components are production-ready: Inbox for in-app notification centers, Preferences for user control over channels and topics, and Toasts for real-time alerts. These aren't demos. They're what companies like Twilio and LaunchDarkly run in production. See our guide on how to build a notification center.
Native Slack and Microsoft Teams integration means B2B customers can receive notifications where they already work. Most competitors treat these as afterthoughts or don't support them at all. Check out our guide on building Slack and Teams notifications.
Courier's MCP server brings AI-powered assistance directly into your IDE. Use natural language in Cursor or Claude Code to send messages, manage users, and integrate SDKs without leaving your coding environment. The Courier CLI handles local development, testing, and deployment workflows.
Teams that need both product notifications and marketing messages without maintaining two separate platforms. Visual journey orchestration, drop-in components, and native business messaging channels.
Free tier with 10,000 notifications/month. Usage-based pricing scales from there. See pricing.
Knock focuses on workflow management and batching. It's a solid developer-first platform with good documentation and a clean API.
Engineering teams focused primarily on transactional notifications who already have established provider relationships.
$25M Series A led by Craft Ventures.
Novu is the leading open-source option in the notification infrastructure space. If you need to self-host or want full control over the codebase, it's worth evaluating.
Teams with strict data residency requirements or those who want to modify the source code.
$20M+ raised, investors include Dell Technologies Capital.
Both platforms target developers. The difference is in channel coverage and approach.
| Capability | Courier | Knock |
|---|---|---|
| Message types | Product + Marketing (hybrid) | Product notifications only |
| Channels supported | Email, SMS, Push, In-app, Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, Discord | Email, SMS, Push, In-app, Slack (limited) |
| Microsoft Teams | Native integration | Not supported |
| Slack support | Native, rich messages with blocks | Basic |
| Visual journey builder | Full Journeys with product events, branching, API calls | Workflow editor, less flexible |
| Drop-in components | Inbox, Preferences, Toasts (production-ready) | Feed component, more basic |
| Provider abstraction | 50+ integrations with failover | Requires external providers |
| Template design | Visual Design Studio + code options | Code-focused |
| AI tooling | MCP server + CLI | CLI only |
The bottom line: Knock works well if you only need product notifications and already have provider relationships. Courier makes more sense if you need both product and marketing messages, journey orchestration, drop-in UI components, or native business messaging (especially Teams).
This comes down to build vs. buy, or more accurately, operate vs. outsource.
| Capability | Courier | Novu |
|---|---|---|
| Message types | Product + Marketing (hybrid) | Product notifications only |
| Channels supported | Email, SMS, Push, In-app, Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, Discord | Email, SMS, Push, In-app, Slack |
| Microsoft Teams | Native integration | Not supported |
| Deployment | Managed cloud | Cloud or self-hosted |
| B2B customer journeys | Visual Journeys with product events | Workflow builder |
| Enterprise SLA | Yes | Varies |
| Component quality | Production-ready | Functional |
| AI tooling | MCP server + CLI | Not available |
| Open source | No | Yes (MIT core) |
The bottom line: Choose Novu if self-hosting is a requirement or you want to contribute to the codebase. Choose Courier if you want managed infrastructure that handles both product and marketing messages with enterprise reliability and broader channel support.
Most teams underestimate the complexity. Reliable multi-channel delivery, user preference management, provider failover, and observability across all of it takes serious engineering investment.

Twilio uses Courier to power internal and customer-facing notifications across their product suite, taking advantage of provider abstraction to route through their own Twilio services alongside alternatives.
LaunchDarkly consolidated fragmented notification logic into Courier, enabling their product team to iterate on messaging flows without engineering involvement for every change.
Fluint uses Courier's journey orchestration to drive B2B customer engagement, keeping stakeholders informed throughout complex sales processes.
Nav leverages Courier for banking notifications in their fintech platform, where reliability and compliance are non-negotiable.
Notification infrastructure is one of those backend systems that seems simple until you build it. Most teams discover the complexity after they've committed to a homegrown approach.
If you're evaluating platforms, start with these questions:
Check out our SDK documentation and API reference to see the developer experience firsthand.
Ready to see how Courier handles notification infrastructure? Start free with 10,000 notifications/month, or book a demo to see Journeys and drop-in components in action.
Multichannel means sending notifications across multiple channels like email, SMS, and push. Omnichannel adds coordination and context. Messages are aware of each other, respect user preferences, and route intelligently based on behavior. A user who opened your push notification doesn't also get the email. Notification infrastructure platforms handle this orchestration automatically.
A notification center is an in-app inbox where users can view, manage, and interact with their notifications. Building one from scratch requires handling real-time updates, read/unread state, cross-device sync, pagination, and preference management. Most teams underestimate the complexity. Courier provides a drop-in Inbox component that handles all of this out of the box.
You need to integrate with the Slack API and Microsoft Graph API, handle OAuth authentication, manage workspace connections, and build message formatting for each platform's block kit. Courier provides native Slack and Teams integration through a single API, so you send one notification and it renders correctly in both platforms without separate implementations.
Customer engagement platforms like Braze and Customer.io focus on marketing campaigns, audience segmentation, and lifecycle messaging for marketers. Customer communication platforms include those capabilities but also handle product notifications, transactional messages, and developer-friendly infrastructure. Courier is a hybrid that handles both product and marketing messages, so teams don't need separate systems.
You can build one yourself, which typically takes 2-3 months of engineering time for a production-ready implementation. Or you can use a drop-in component from a notification infrastructure platform. Courier's Inbox is a React component that provides a full notification center with real-time updates, preference management, and customizable styling.
Build if you send over 100 million notifications monthly, have dedicated infrastructure engineers, and can invest 6+ months in development. Buy if speed matters, you're under 20 million notifications monthly, or your team should focus on your core product. Most companies underestimate the ongoing maintenance burden of homegrown notification systems.
Notification orchestration is the logic layer that determines what to send, when, through which channel, and to whom. It includes workflows with branching, delays, and conditions based on user behavior. For example: send push first, wait an hour, check if opened, fall back to email if not. Courier's Journeys feature handles this through a visual builder.
You need a preference center UI, a backend to store preferences, logic to enforce them across all sends, and compliance with regulations like GDPR and CAN-SPAM. Courier provides a drop-in Preferences component and automatically enforces user choices across all channels without additional code.

What's the Difference Between Omnichannel & Multichannel
Most teams say "omnichannel" when they mean "multichannel," and in most cases the distinction doesn't matter much. But if you truly want to provide an exceptional customer engagement experience you should know the difference. Both involve sending messages across email, push, SMS, Slack, and in-app. They terms diverge when those channels know about each other. Multichannel means you can reach users on multiple channels. Omnichannel means those channels share state, so a user who reads a push notification won't get the same message via email an hour later. This guide breaks down the real distinctions, when the difference actually matters, and which messaging platforms deliver true omnichannel coordination.
By Kyle Seyler
February 11, 2026

A Resilient Notification Strategy for Regulated Industries
Notification compliance isn't a legal checklist—it's an infrastructure problem. In 2026, Reg E deadlines, HIPAA content rules, and TCPA consent requirements dictate your system architecture. This guide breaks down the engineering constraints of regulated notifications for fintech, healthcare, and insurance. Learn why hard-coded deadlines fail, how "alert without disclosing" works in practice, and why the smart escalation pattern (Push → SMS → Email) is the only way to satisfy both user urgency and regulatory documentation. Build systems that absorb complexity, not application code that breaks every time a state law changes.
By Kyle Seyler
February 11, 2026

The Unsubscribe Paradox: Why Making It Easier to Leave Keeps People Around
Hiding the unsubscribe link doesn't keep people subscribed. It makes them mark you as spam, and spam complaints hurt your sender reputation roughly 1000x more than unsubscribes. The brands with the lowest unsubscribe rates don't achieve it by making the door hard to find. They achieve it by making people not want to leave. This guide covers the math behind why easy unsubscribes protect deliverability, how preference centers reduce list churn, and what your unsubscribe flow should actually look like.
By Kyle Seyler
February 09, 2026
© 2026 Courier. All rights reserved.